https://junejalegal.firm.in/Juneja LegalVivitiCMS2023-05-15T21:34:00+05:30Juneja Legaltag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-15:/entries/70099Real Estate Laws in India: A Step-by-Step Guide for Property Buyers2023-05-15T21:34:00+05:302023-05-15T22:56:33+05:30<p><strong>Purchasing Real Estate in India: A Comprehensive Legal Guide</strong></p>
<p>Purchasing real estate in India can be a complex process due to the multitude of laws and regulations governing property transactions. This comprehensive guide aims to provide you with a detailed understanding of the major legal considerations you should be aware of as a property buyer in India. By following these guidelines, you can navigate the process confidently and ensure a smooth and legally sound purchase.</p>
<p><strong>1. Understanding the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) 2016</strong></p>
<p>The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) 2016 is a significant piece of legislation that has brought about substantial reforms in the Indian real estate sector. Its primary objective is to ensure transparency and fairness in residential real estate transactions by establishing a Real Estate Regulatory Authority in each state.</p>
<p>Under RERA, developers are obligated to register their projects with the Regulatory Authority and provide regular updates on the progress of the projects. Any delays in project completion can lead to penalties imposed on the developers. These provisions provide buyers with essential protection against common issues such as project delays and changes in project plans without their consent.</p>
<p><strong>2. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882</strong></p>
<p>The Transfer of Property Act, 1882, governs the transfer of property in India. This act provides comprehensive guidelines on the various methods through which property can be legally transferred, including sale, mortgage, lease, gift, and exchange. Familiarizing yourself with this act will enable you to navigate the process of transferring property title after purchase effectively.</p>
<p><strong>3. The Indian Contract Act, 1872</strong></p>
<p>The Indian Contract Act, 1872, holds significant importance as it governs all agreements and contracts in India. It ensures that the terms and conditions specified in the purchase agreement between the buyer and the seller are legally enforceable. Understanding this act will help you ensure that your purchase agreement is legally sound and provides adequate protection for your interests.</p>
<p><strong>4. The Registration Act, 1908</strong></p>
<p>The Registration Act, 1908, mandates the registration of all property transactions in India. The primary purpose of registration is to maintain an official record of property transactions and prevent fraud. It is crucial to note that unregistered agreements hold no legal validity. The registration process involves paying the necessary stamp duty and registration fees.</p>
<p><strong>5. The Stamp Duty Act</strong></p>
<p>Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the corresponding State Stamp Acts, every property transaction requires the payment of stamp duty. The rate of stamp duty varies from state to state and is typically calculated as a percentage of the transaction value. Payment of stamp duty and ensuring that the transaction agreement is duly stamped are crucial for its legal validity.</p>
<p><strong>Step-by-Step Guide to Buying Property in India</strong></p>
<p>Now that we have covered the key laws governing property transactions in India, let's explore a step-by-step guide to buying property:</p>
<p><em>Step 1: Property Identification and Verification</em></p>
<p>Begin by identifying the property you wish to purchase and thoroughly verifying its legal status. It is essential to review the property's title deed to ensure that the seller has the rightful ownership and authority to sell the property. Additionally, verify that the property is free from any pending litigation or unpaid dues.</p>
<p><em>Step 2: Agreement to Sell</em></p>
<p>Once you are satisfied with the property's legal status, the next step is to enter into an 'Agreement to Sell' with the seller. This agreement should encompass all the terms and conditions of the sale, ensuring that both parties are in agreement and adequately protected.</p>
<p><em>Step 3: Paying Stamp Duty</em></p>
<p>Before the sale deed can be executed, it is necessary to pay the stamp duty. The amount of stamp duty depends on the property's market value and varies from state to state. Ensure that you fulfill this requirement to ensure that there are no troubles in future.</p>
<p><em>Step 4: Execution of Sale Deed</em></p>
<p>The sale deed is the main legal document in any property sale transaction. It must be executed by both the seller and the buyer, clearly detailing the property and the terms of the sale. The sale deed serves as proof of transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer.</p>
<p><em>Step 5: Registration of the Sale Deed</em></p>
<p>After the sale deed is executed, it must be registered at the local Sub-Registrar of Assurances office. This step involves submitting the necessary documents and paying a registration fee. Both the buyer and the seller must be present during the registration process. Registration ensures the legality of the transaction and provides official recognition of the buyer's ownership rights.</p>
<p><em>Step 6: Transfer of Property</em></p>
<p>Following the registration of the sale deed, the property is legally transferred to the buyer. To complete the transfer process, the buyer should apply to the local municipal authority to have the property transferred to their name in the municipal records. This step is important to establish the buyer's ownership and update the property records accordingly.</p>
<p><em>Step 7: Possession</em></p>
<p>Once all the necessary formalities are complete, the seller should hand over possession of the property to the buyer. At this point, the buyer becomes the legal owner of the property and assumes full rights and responsibilities associated with it.</p>
<p>It is important to remember that when purchasing real estate in India, it is crucial to ensure that all legal formalities are followed meticulously. Engaging the services of a qualified real estate lawyer or expert can provide valuable guidance and assistance throughout the process, safeguarding your rights and interests.</p>
<p>In conclusion, purchasing real estate in India involves navigating various legal considerations. Understanding the laws and regulations, such as RERA, the Transfer of Property Act, the Indian Contract Act, the Registration Act, and the Stamp Duty Act, is essential for a smooth and legally sound property transaction. By following the step-by-step guide provided in this article and seeking professional advice when necessary, you can proceed with confidence and ensure a successful property purchase in India.</p>
<p>Please note that this guide serves as general information and does not constitute legal advice. It is always recommended to consult with a legal professional to address specific concerns and obtain personalized guidance for your real estate transactions.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-14:/entries/70098 Navigating Intellectual Property Laws in India: A Complete Guide for Businesses2023-05-14T23:18:00+05:302023-05-14T23:27:31+05:30<p><img alt="Intellectual Property Rights Advocates" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697794/427;285;e5b57ec55e3de4624eb1d15b9ab19c1f87cb2f53.jpg" style="border:none; float:left"></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>Intellectual property (IP) is a valuable asset for businesses of all sizes. It can protect your company's ideas, inventions, and creative works, giving you a competitive edge in the marketplace. In India, there are a number of IP laws that businesses need to be aware of. This article provides a comprehensive overview of IP laws in India, including copyright, trademark, patent, industrial design, geographical indication, and trade secret protection.</p>
<p><strong>Importance of Intellectual Property for Businesses</strong></p>
<p>IP can be a valuable asset for businesses in a number of ways. It can:</p>
<ul>
<li>Protect your company's ideas and inventions from being copied by competitors</li>
<li>Give you a competitive edge in the marketplace</li>
<li>Increase your brand awareness and reputation</li>
<li>Attract new customers and investors</li>
<li>Generate revenue through licensing and other commercialization activities</li>
<li>Enhance your company's value</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Overview of Intellectual Property Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>India has a comprehensive set of IP laws that protect a variety of intellectual property assets. These laws are administered by the Intellectual Property Office of India (IPOI).</p>
<p><strong>The following are some of the key IP laws in India:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Copyright Act, 1957: This law protects original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, as well as cinematograph films, sound recordings, and computer programs.</li>
<li>The Trademarks Act, 1999: This law protects distinctive signs, such as words, logos, and slogans, that are used to identify the goods or services of a particular business.</li>
<li>The Patents Act, 1970: This law protects new inventions, including products, processes, and methods of manufacturing.</li>
<li>The Designs Act, 2000: This law protects the ornamental features of products, such as their shape, pattern, or ornamentation.</li>
<li>The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999: This law protects the names of goods that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.</li>
<li>The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001: This law protects new plant varieties developed by farmers or plant breeders.</li>
<li>The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000: This law protects the layout-designs of integrated circuits.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Copyright Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection that gives the creator of an original work exclusive rights for its use and distribution. In India, copyright protection is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957.</p>
<p>Copyright protection extends to a wide range of creative works, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Literary works, such as books, articles, and poems</li>
<li>Dramatic works, such as plays, screenplays, and musical compositions</li>
<li>Musical works, such as songs and instrumental pieces</li>
<li>Artistic works, such as paintings, sculptures, and photographs</li>
<li>Cinematograph films</li>
<li>Sound recordings</li>
<li>Computer programs</li>
</ul>
<p>Copyright protection in India is automatic. This means that no registration or other formality is required to obtain copyright protection. However, it is advisable to register your copyright works with the Copyright Office of India (IPOI). Registration provides a number of benefits, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>A public record of your copyright ownership</li>
<li>A presumption of your copyright ownership in the event of a dispute</li>
<li>A legal basis for seeking damages in the event of copyright infringement</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Trademark Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>A trademark is a distinctive sign that is used to identify the goods or services of a particular business. In India, trademark protection is governed by the Trademarks Act, 1999.</p>
<p>To be registrable as a trademark, a sign must be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Distinctive</li>
<li>Capable of being represented on the Register of Trademarks</li>
<li>Not contrary to public policy or morality</li>
</ul>
<p>Once a trademark is registered, the owner of the trademark has the exclusive right to use the trademark in relation to the goods or services for which it is registered. The owner of the trademark can also prevent others from using the trademark in a way that is likely to cause confusion or deception.</p>
<p><strong>Patent Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>A patent is a form of intellectual property protection that gives the inventor of an invention the exclusive right to make, use, sell, and import the invention for a limited period of time. In India, patent protection is governed by the Patents Act, 1970.</p>
<p>To be patentable, an invention must be:</p>
<ul>
<li>New</li>
<li>Inventive</li>
<li>Capable of industrial application</li>
</ul>
<p>The term of a patent in India is 20 years from the filing date of the patent.</p>
<p><strong>Industrial Design Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>An industrial design is the ornamental or aesthetic aspect of an article. In India, industrial design protection is governed by the Designs Act, 2000.</p>
<p>To be registrable as an industrial design, a design must be:</p>
<ul>
<li>New</li>
<li>Original</li>
<li>Capable of being registered</li>
</ul>
<p>Once a design is registered, the owner of the design has the exclusive right to use the design for a period of ten years from the filing date of the registration.</p>
<p><strong>Geographical Indication Laws in India</strong></p>
<p>A geographical indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin. In India, GI protection is governed by the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999.</p>
<p>To be registered as a GI, a product must meet the following criteria:</p>
<ul>
<li>It must have a specific geographical origin.</li>
<li>It must possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.</li>
<li>It must be used on products that are manufactured, processed, or prepared in that geographical region.</li>
</ul>
<p>Once a GI is registered, the owner of the GI has the exclusive right to use the GI on products that meet the criteria for registration.</p>
<p><strong>Trade Secret Protection</strong></p>
<p>A trade secret is a confidential business information that gives a business an economic advantage over its competitors. In India, trade secret protection is not governed by any specific law. However, trade secrets can be protected under the law of contract, the law of torts, and the law of equity.</p>
<p>To be protected as a trade secret, information must meet the following criteria:</p>
<ul>
<li>It must be confidential.</li>
<li>It must have economic value.</li>
<li>It must be the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>IP Enforcement and Dispute Resolution</strong></p>
<p>There are a number of ways to enforce IP rights in India. These include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Filing a civil suit for infringement</li>
<li>Filing a criminal complaint for infringement</li>
<li>Obtaining an injunction to prevent infringement</li>
<li>Seeking damages for infringement</li>
</ul>
<p>IP disputes can be resolved through a variety of mechanisms, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Litigation</li>
<li>Arbitration</li>
<li>Mediation</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>IP Strategies for Businesses</strong></p>
<p>IP is an important asset for businesses of all sizes. By taking steps to protect your IP, you can give your business a competitive edge in the marketplace. Some tips for developing an IP strategy include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Identify your IP assets.</li>
<li>Assess the value of your IP assets.</li>
<li>Develop a plan to protect your IP assets.</li>
<li>Monitor your IP assets for infringement.</li>
<li>Enforce your IP rights.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Intellectual property is a valuable asset for businesses of all sizes. By understanding the different types of IP and the laws that protect them, businesses can take steps to protect their IP assets and give themselves a competitive edge in the marketplace.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-13:/entries/70094Consumer Protection Laws in India: Your Rights as a Consumer2023-05-13T02:13:00+05:302023-05-13T02:18:10+05:30<p><img alt="Consumer Protection Laws in India: Your Rights as a Consumer" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697788/298;291;5f581b0ec250a1490109dadea3e2d9dbee8689c0.jpg" style="border:none; float:right"></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>Consumers are the backbone of any economy. They are the ones who drive demand and create jobs. In India, consumers are increasingly becoming aware of their rights and are demanding better protection. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a landmark legislation that has been enacted to protect the rights of consumers in India.</p>
<p><strong>The Consumer Protection Act, 2019</strong></p>
<p>The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a comprehensive legislation that provides for a variety of consumer rights and remedies. The Act covers all goods and services, including those sold online. It also provides for a three-tier consumer dispute redressal mechanism, consisting of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.</p>
<p><strong>Consumer Rights in India</strong></p>
<p>The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 recognizes six consumer rights, namely:</p>
<ul>
<li>Right to safety: Consumers have the right to be protected against goods and services that are hazardous to life and health.</li>
<li>Right to information: Consumers have the right to be given accurate and complete information about goods and services before they make a purchase.</li>
<li>Right to choose: Consumers have the right to choose from a variety of goods and services at competitive prices.</li>
<li>Right to be heard: Consumers have the right to file a complaint against a trader or service provider if they are not satisfied with the goods or services they have received.</li>
<li>Right to redressal: Consumers have the right to seek redressal against unfair trade practices or defective goods or services.</li>
<li>Right to consumer education: Consumers have the right to be educated about their rights and responsibilities.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Unfair Trade Practices</strong></p>
<p>Unfair trade practices are those that are misleading or deceptive and that harm consumers. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 prohibits a variety of unfair trade practices, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Misleading or deceptive advertising</li>
<li>False or misleading claims about goods or services</li>
<li>Aggressive or harassing sales tactics</li>
<li>Unreasonable or excessive prices</li>
<li>Refusal to repair or replace defective goods or services</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Product Liability</strong></p>
<p>Product liability is the legal responsibility of a manufacturer or seller for damages caused by a defective product. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provides for product liability, and consumers can seek compensation for injuries or damages caused by defective goods.</p>
<p><strong>Consumer Disputes Redressal Mechanism</strong></p>
<p>The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 establishes a three-tier consumer dispute redressal mechanism, consisting of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Consumers can file a complaint with any of these forums if they are not satisfied with the goods or services they have received.</p>
<p><strong>E-commerce and Consumer Protection</strong></p>
<p>E-commerce is the buying and selling of goods or services online. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 applies to e-commerce transactions, and consumers have the same rights as they do with offline transactions. However, there are some unique challenges and concerns related to online consumer transactions, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>The difficulty of identifying the seller or trader</li>
<li>The difficulty of inspecting the goods before purchase</li>
<li>The difficulty of returning defective goods</li>
<li>The difficulty of getting a refund</li>
</ul>
<p>The government is taking steps to address these challenges and concerns, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Requiring e-commerce platforms to collect and maintain information about sellers and traders</li>
<li>Requiring e-commerce platforms to provide consumers with the ability to inspect goods before purchase</li>
<li>Requiring e-commerce platforms to provide consumers with the ability to return defective goods for a refund</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Consumer Awareness and Empowerment</strong></p>
<p>Consumer education and awareness is essential for protecting consumer rights. Consumers need to be aware of their rights and responsibilities in order to make informed choices and to seek redressal when needed. The government and consumer organizations are working to raise consumer awareness through a variety of initiatives, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Consumer education campaigns</li>
<li>Consumer helplines</li>
<li>Consumer websites</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Consumer protection is essential for a healthy and vibrant economy. Consumers are the backbone of any economy, and they deserve to be protected from unfair trade practices and defective goods or services. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a landmark legislation that has been enacted to protect the rights of consumers in India. Consumers need to be aware of their rights and responsibilities in order to make informed choices and to seek redressal when needed. The government and consumer organizations are working to raise consumer awareness through a variety of initiatives</p>
<p> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-12:/entries/70093Supreme Court restores powers to Delhi Government2023-05-12T00:43:00+05:302023-05-12T00:54:49+05:30<p>In a pivotal judgment on Thursday, the Supreme Court reinstated the full authority of the Delhi government, emphasizing that the Lieutenant Governor (LG), who is a central government appointee, does not possess autonomous decision-making power and must operate under the counsel of the elected government.</p>
<p>This landmark decision concludes a protracted dispute between the Delhi government and the LG, marking a significant triumph for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, which has been embroiled in this conflict for years.</p>
<p>The ruling, delivered by a five-member Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, clarified that the LG does not have the independence to act without the elected government and must adhere to the advice provided by the council of ministers. Additionally, the court stated that the LG cannot deny approval to any bill sanctioned by the Delhi Assembly, nor can he meddle in the city's day-to-day governance.</p>
<p>This judgment is a considerable blow to the central government, which attempted to exercise control over the Delhi government through the LG. The court's decision now clears the path for the AAP government to operate free from LG interference.</p>
<p>The court detailed several critical conclusions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Union Territories don't share a common governance structure.</li>
<li>National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) stands out among other Union Territories due to its "sui generis" status as per Article 239AA.</li>
<li>NCTD's Legislative Assembly has jurisdiction over areas in List II and List III, barring specifically excluded ones from List II. Parliament holds legislative power over all matters in Lists II and III pertaining to NCTD.</li>
<li>NCTD's executive authority coincides with its legislative power.</li>
<li>The Union of India only has executive authority over three areas in List II where NCTD lacks legislative competence.</li>
<li>NCTD's executive power is subject to the Union's executive power granted by the Constitution or by a Parliamentary law.</li>
<li>Article 239AA(3) does not further restrict NCTD's legislative power over the State or Concurrent List.</li>
<li>NCTD's legislative power is to be guided by the broader principles and provisions of the Constitution.</li>
<li>NCTD has legislative and executive power over "Services", that is, Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule.</li>
</ul>
<p>The court's ruling endorses democracy and federalism in India, underscoring the elected government's principal role in state or union territory governance and asserting that the central government cannot intervene in their daily administration.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-11:/entries/70092Inheritance Laws in India: How to Safeguard Your Family's Assets2023-05-11T23:51:00+05:302023-05-11T23:57:01+05:30<p><img alt="" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697785/295;295;6dbd430e81b671b6a4170802caf9edc88e50e653.jpg" style="border:none; float:left">Introduction:</p>
<p>In India, understanding inheritance laws is of paramount importance to ensure the smooth transfer of family assets from one generation to the next. This article aims to provide you with a comprehensive overview of inheritance laws in India and guide you on how to safeguard your family's assets effectively.</p>
<p>I. Types of Assets Covered by Inheritance Laws:<br>
When considering inheritance, it's essential to understand the various types of assets that fall under its purview. These assets include immovable property such as land and houses, movable property like bank accounts and investments, intellectual property such as copyrights and patents, as well as any existing debts and liabilities.</p>
<p>II. Hindu Succession Act:<br>
The Hindu Succession Act lays the foundation for inheritance laws in India. It applies to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs, providing rules for intestate succession (when there is no will). The act defines the rights of male and female heirs and categorizes them into Class I and Class II heirs. It also includes special provisions for situations like coparcenary property and adoption.</p>
<p>III. Wills and Testamentary Succession:<br>
Creating a will is a crucial step in safeguarding your family's assets. A will is a legal document that outlines your wishes for the distribution of your property after your demise. It should include key elements such as the identification of beneficiaries, specific asset distribution, and appointment of an executor. The article explains the revocation and alteration of a will, the probate process, and the importance of choosing a reliable executor.</p>
<p>IV. Mitigating Challenges and Disputes:<br>
Disputes over inheritance can be emotionally and financially draining for families. To minimize the likelihood of such disputes, clear communication and fair division of assets are essential. The article discusses common disputes that arise during inheritance cases and highlights the importance of seeking legal representation to safeguard your family's interests. It also explores alternatives to litigation, such as mediation and arbitration, which can help resolve disputes amicably.</p>
<p>V. Tax Implications:<br>
Inheritance can have tax implications that need to be considered. The article provides an overview of inheritance tax in India, including applicable rates and exemptions. It also explores the impact of inheritance on income tax, wealth tax, and capital gains tax. By understanding the tax implications, you can develop effective tax planning strategies to minimize potential liabilities and maximize the value of inherited assets.</p>
<p>VI. Seeking Professional Assistance:<br>
Given the complexity of inheritance laws in India, seeking professional assistance from a qualified lawyer is strongly advised. The article emphasizes the importance of selecting the right legal advisor who can provide expert guidance tailored to your specific situation. It highlights the value of working with professionals during estate planning and execution, ensuring that your family's assets are safeguarded according to your wishes.</p>
<p>VII. Conclusion:<br>
Inheritance laws in India play a crucial role in preserving and transferring family assets. By comprehending these laws and taking proactive steps, you can safeguard your family's assets effectively. Remember to create a legally valid will, mitigate potential disputes, consider tax implications, and seek professional advice when needed. By doing so, you can ensure a smooth and secure transition of your family's assets to future generations.</p>
<p>In conclusion, with a solid understanding of inheritance laws and the guidance provided in this article, you are well-equipped to protect your family's assets and preserve your legacy for the future. Take the necessary steps today to secure your family's financial well-being and provide peace of mind for generations to come.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-03:/entries/70082The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: A Crucial Respite for Companies in Dire Straits2023-05-03T22:40:00+05:302023-05-06T21:23:57+05:30<p><img alt="Insolvency Law Firm" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697691/307;230;8f88cd65b03616dd80ddddaf5b850e15390c96a5.jpg" style="border:none; float:left"> In the ever-evolving global economic landscape, enterprises often grapple with monetary challenges stemming from multifarious factors such as market volatility, shifting consumer predilections, or unforeseen exigencies. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in India, promulgated in 2016, has transpired as a paradigm shift for financially beleaguered businesses. This blog post will scrutinize the role of the IBC in facilitating businesses to restructure their debts and attain a new lease on life, while concurrently safeguarding the interests of creditors and employees.</p>
<p><strong>The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: A Synopsis</strong></p>
<p>The IBC is a comprehensive and unified statute designed to streamline the process of insolvency resolution and bankruptcy in India. It offers a time-bound and transparent framework for addressing corporate distress, ensuring that businesses can either recuperate from their fiscal tribulations or cease their operations in an orderly fashion. The IBC also establishes the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as the preeminent adjudicating authorities for insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of India is based on the principles of a modern insolvency and bankruptcy framework, taking into account global best practices and the specific needs of the Indian economy. The IBC was formulated after studying the insolvency laws and practices of various countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions with well-developed insolvency frameworks.</p>
<p><strong>Salient Features of the IBC:</strong></p>
<p>1. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP): The CIRP is a time-bound (180 days, extendable up to 270 days) procedure that aspires to resuscitate a company in financial distress. The process commences when a financial or operational creditor, or the company itself, files a petition with the NCLT. Upon acceptance of the application, a moratorium is imposed on all legal proceedings against the company. A Resolution Professional (RP) is appointed to oversee its affairs and devise a resolution plan in collaboration with the Committee of Creditors (CoC).</p>
<p>2. Resolution Plan: The resolution plan is a proposal delineating the strategy to revive the company or liquidate its assets to repay its debts. The CoC, comprising the company's financial creditors, evaluates the plan and ratifies it with a 66% majority vote. If the plan is sanctioned by the NCLT, it becomes obligatory for all stakeholders, and the company can initiate its restructuring process.</p>
<p>3. Liquidation: If the CIRP fails to generate a viable resolution plan within the stipulated time frame, the company may be liquidated. The RP is responsible for divesting the company's assets and disbursing the proceeds among its creditors in accordance with the precedence established by the IBC.</p>
<p>4. Fast-Track Insolvency Resolution Process: The IBC furnishes a fast-track insolvency resolution process for diminutive companies, start-ups, and unlisted companies with aggregate assets below a specified threshold. This process must be culminated within 90 days, extendable up to an additional 45 days.</p>
<p><strong>Safeguarding the Interests of Creditors and Employees</strong></p>
<p>The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides a balanced and equitable approach to safeguarding the interests of both creditors and employees during the insolvency resolution process. This is achieved through the involvement of creditors in decision-making and the prioritization of employees' claims during asset distribution in case of liquidation. </p>
<p>The IBC establishes the Committee of Creditors (CoC) as a critical decision-making body during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The CoC is primarily composed of financial creditors of the distressed company. By involving the creditors in the resolution process, the IBC ensures that their interests are taken into account when determining the future course of action for the debtor company. The CoC plays a significant role in the following aspects of the CIRP:<br>
a. To appoint and oversee the Resolution Professional (RP), who manages the debtor company's operations during the CIRP.<br>
b. To review and approve the resolution plan, which outlines the strategy for reviving the company or liquidating its assets to repay debts.<br>
c. To Decide on matters related to the debtor company's operations and finances during the CIRP.<br>
d. To vote on key decisions, such as the approval of the resolution plan, an extension of the CIRP timeline, or the initiation of the liquidation process.</p>
<p>If the insolvency resolution process fails to yield a viable resolution plan within the stipulated time frame, the debtor company may be liquidated. In such cases, the IBC provides a specific order of priority, known as the "waterfall mechanism," for the distribution of liquidation proceeds among various claimants, including employees. As per the IBC, employees' outstanding payments (such as salaries, wages, and other benefits) are given high priority in the waterfall mechanism. Employees' claims rank above unsecured financial creditors and government dues, ensuring that they receive their outstanding payments before other claimants in case of liquidation. This prioritization of employees' claims reflects the IBC's intent to protect the interests of workers, who are often among the most vulnerable stakeholders in the insolvency process. By preserving the rights of creditors and employees, the IBC ensures that the insolvency resolution process is fair and equitable for all parties involved.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>
<p>The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has emerged as an indispensable lifeline for struggling businesses in India. By offering a time-bound and transparent framework for insolvency resolution, the IBC enables businesses to either surmount their financial predicaments or wind up their operations in an orderly manner. Furthermore, the IBC safeguards the interests of creditors and employees, ensuring they receive equitable treatment in the resolution process.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-05-02:/entries/70079Rights of an Accused Person - The Indian Context2023-05-02T21:42:00+05:302023-05-04T01:58:46+05:30<p><img alt="" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697642/307;205;2b21d2d64331ee6ea0a7eb58de12e219091e90a9.jpg" style="border:none; float:left">India, the land of diverse cultures and traditions, embraces a unique blend of justice and compassion in its legal system. Anchored in the Constitution, the rights of an accused person are an indispensable aspect of India's criminal jurisprudence. The Indian legal system draws inspiration from the principles of human dignity, fairness, and justice that echo the spirit of the makers of the Constitution of India. In this feature article, we will explore the rights of an accused person in the Indian context, reflecting upon the values championed by these legendary jurists.</p>
<p><strong>Right to Equality and Fair Treatment:</strong></p>
<p>Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws to all individuals. This fundamental right ensures that an accused person is treated fairly and without discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. The relentless pursuit of social justice and equality, as well as unwavering commitment to the rule of law, have contributed significantly to shaping India's legal framework to protect the rights of the accused.</p>
<p><strong>Presumption of Innocence:</strong></p>
<p>The golden thread of criminal jurisprudence is the presumption of innocence. Until proven guilty, an accused person is presumed innocent. This principle, deeply ingrained in the Indian legal system, safeguards the rights of the accused and ensures that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. Legal experts have been consistent advocates of this principle, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the rights of the accused to prevent miscarriages of justice.</p>
<p><strong>Right to Legal Representation:</strong></p>
<p>The right to legal representation, enshrined in Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution, guarantees that an accused person has access to a lawyer of their choice. This fundamental right ensures that an accused person is not denied the opportunity to present their case effectively before the court. The emphasis on the importance of legal representation in the Indian legal system reflects the commitment to uphold the rights of the accused and ensure a fair trial.</p>
<p><strong>Right to a Speedy Trial:</strong></p>
<p>A speedy trial is an essential component of the right to life and personal liberty enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Prolonged judicial proceedings can cause undue hardship and distress to the accused and their families. Therefore, the Indian legal system emphasizes the importance of expeditious disposal of cases to safeguard the rights of the accused and ensure justice.</p>
<p><strong>Protection against Double Jeopardy and Self-Incrimination:</strong></p>
<p>Article 20 of the Indian Constitution safeguards the rights of an accused person by providing protection against double jeopardy and self-incrimination. This constitutional guarantee ensures that an individual cannot be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once and cannot be compelled to be a witness against themselves. These protections are crucial in maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system and upholding the rights of the accused.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br>
The rights of an accused person in the Indian context are deeply rooted in the principles of justice, fairness, and human dignity. The Constitution of India, through its various provisions, seeks to ensure that the accused are treated fairly and equitably, thereby safeguarding their fundamental rights. The rich jurisprudential heritage of India reflects the unwavering commitment to uphold the rights of the accused and ensure that the criminal justice system remains just and compassionate.</p>
<p> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-30:/entries/70070Case Management Hearing in Commercial Courts Act - A Short Note2023-04-30T19:26:00+05:302023-05-04T01:59:02+05:30<p>The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 brought a significant change to the landscape of commercial dispute resolution in India, with a primary focus on improving case management and expediting the resolution process. One of the key amendments introduced by the Act is the Case Management Hearing (CMH), which aims to streamline the litigation process and ensure that commercial disputes are resolved in a timely manner.</p>
<p>Purpose and Objectives of Case Management Hearing:</p>
<p>The primary purpose of the Case Management Hearing is to enable the efficient management of cases and optimize the use of judicial resources. The objectives of the CMH include:</p>
<p>1. Identifying the issues in dispute between the parties at an early stage to narrow down the scope of the trial.<br>
2. Encouraging parties to explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, when appropriate.<br>
3. Establishing a clear timeline for the completion of various stages of litigation, including the filing of written statements, affidavits, and discovery of documents.<br>
4. Ensuring that the parties adhere to the timelines and minimize delays in the litigation process.<br>
5. Facilitating the efficient use of court resources by scheduling hearings and allocating time effectively.</p>
<p>The procedure of a Case Management Hearing:</p>
<p>Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a Case Management Hearing must be conducted within four weeks from the date of filing the affidavit of admission or denial of documents by all parties. During the CMH, the judge will perform the following tasks:</p>
<p>1. Frame the issues in dispute and identify the key questions that need to be resolved during the trial.<br>
2. Decide the order in which the issues will be addressed and the manner in which evidence will be presented by the parties.<br>
3. Establish timelines for the completion of various stages of litigation, including the filing of written statements, affidavits, and discovery of documents.<br>
4. Encourage parties to explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms if deemed appropriate.<br>
5. Allocate time for oral arguments, and set dates for hearings and trial.</p>
<p>Role of Judges in Case Management Hearings:</p>
<p>Judges play a crucial role in the CMH process, as they are responsible for ensuring that the objectives of the CMH are met. Judges must:</p>
<p>1. Actively engage with the parties to identify the issues in dispute and facilitate the narrowing down of the scope of the trial.<br>
2. Encourage parties to consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, when appropriate.<br>
3. Monitor the progress of the case and ensure that the parties adhere to the established timelines.<br>
4. Allocate resources effectively, including setting hearing dates and managing court time efficiently.<br>
5. Exercise their discretion to enforce cost orders or impose penalties if parties do not comply with the timelines or directions given during the CMH.</p>
<p>Impact of Case Management Hearings on Timely Disposal of Commercial Disputes:</p>
<p>The introduction of the Case Management Hearing has significantly contributed to the timely disposal of commercial disputes by:</p>
<p>1. Streamlining the litigation process and ensuring that disputes are resolved more efficiently.<br>
2. Facilitating early identification of issues and encouraging parties to explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, which can save time and resources.<br>
3. Establishing clear timelines and holding parties accountable for adhering to these timelines, which helps in reducing unnecessary delays in the litigation process.<br>
4. Ensuring that judges play a proactive role in managing cases, thereby optimizing the use of judicial resources.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the Case Management Hearing is an essential mechanism under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which has significantly improved the efficiency of commercial dispute resolution in India. By establishing clear timelines and promoting active case management by judges, the CMH has contributed to the timely disposal of commercial disputes and optimized the use of judicial resources.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-29:/entries/70069The Constitutional Principle of Tenure at Pleasure: Balancing Public Interest and Fundamental Rights2023-04-29T21:07:00+05:302023-05-04T01:59:16+05:30<p><em><strong>Introduction</strong></em></p>
<p>In a landmark judgment in the case of State of HP Vs Raj Kumar, 2023(3) SCC 773 the Supreme Court of India elucidated the constitutional provision that allows public employment on the basis of tenure at the pleasure of the President or the Governor. The Court noted that this principle, enshrined in Article 310 of the Constitution, is grounded in public policy, public interest, and public good. Furthermore, the Court emphasized that this provision directly influences the powers of Parliament or the legislature to make laws, as well as the executive to make rules for specifying conditions of service under Article 309. This article seeks to expand upon the Supreme Court's judgment by examining the relationship between the tenure at pleasure principle, public interest, and the fundamentals of constitutionalism.</p>
<p><em><strong>I. Tenure at Pleasure: Origins and Rationale</strong></em></p>
<p>The principle of tenure at pleasure has its roots in the English common law system, where public servants held office at the pleasure of the Crown. This historical background has shaped the Indian Constitution's approach to public employment, which is now expressed through Article 310.</p>
<p>The rationale behind the tenure at pleasure principle is to ensure that the executive has the necessary flexibility to manage public servants efficiently and effectively. By allowing the President or the Governor to terminate the services of public employees without express limitations or restrictions, the Constitution aims to promote the public interest, public policy, and the public good.</p>
<p><em><strong>II. Balancing Tenure at Pleasure with the Fundamentals of Constitutionalism</strong></em></p>
<p>While the Constitution provides for the tenure at pleasure principle, it is essential to recognize that this provision is subject to the overarching framework of constitutionalism. The fundamentals of constitutionalism include the protection of individual rights, the rule of law, and the separation of powers. Therefore, the power to terminate public employment at pleasure must be exercised in a manner that respects these constitutional principles.</p>
<p>1. Protection of Individual Rights</p>
<p>One of the primary concerns in balancing the tenure at pleasure principle with the fundamentals of constitutionalism is the protection of individual rights. Public servants, like all citizens, are entitled to certain fundamental rights, including the right to equality, the right to freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life and personal liberty. It is crucial that the exercise of the tenure at pleasure power does not infringe upon these rights.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court has held that while the tenure at pleasure principle grants considerable discretion to the executive, this power must be exercised in a non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory manner. Any termination of service must be based on reasonable grounds, and due process must be followed to ensure that the affected individual's rights are protected.</p>
<p>2. Rule of Law</p>
<p>The rule of law is another fundamental principle of constitutionalism that must be upheld in the exercise of the tenure at pleasure power. The rule of law requires that the government's actions be grounded in established legal principles and processes. It prevents arbitrary action and ensures that the government is accountable to the people.</p>
<p>In the context of the tenure at pleasure principle, the rule of law requires that any termination of public employment must be based on established rules and regulations, as well as the principles of natural justice. This ensures that public servants are treated fairly and that the government's actions are transparent and accountable.</p>
<p>3. Separation of Powers</p>
<p>The separation of powers is a crucial aspect of constitutionalism that seeks to maintain a balance between the different branches of government. It prevents the concentration of power in a single branch and ensures that each branch exercises its powers within the limits prescribed by the Constitution.</p>
<p>In relation to the tenure at pleasure principle, the separation of powers requires that the powers of the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary be respected. The executive's power to terminate public employment must not encroach upon the powers of the legislature to make laws or the judiciary to adjudicate disputes.</p>
<p><em><strong>III. Safeguarding Public Interest and Ensuring Effective Governance</strong></em></p>
<p>The tenure at pleasure principle, while subject to the fundamentals of constitutionalism, still serves a critical role in ensuring effective governance and upholding the public interest. In certain situations, the ability to terminate public employment at the pleasure of the President or the Governor can be necessary for maintaining efficiency and integrity within the administration.</p>
<p>1. Efficiency in Public Administration</p>
<p>The principle of tenure at pleasure allows the executive to respond swiftly and decisively to situations that may require changes within the public administration. For example, if a public servant demonstrates incompetence or is unable to fulfil their duties effectively, the tenure at pleasure provision enables the President or the Governor to take appropriate action without being encumbered by bureaucratic red tape. This can lead to a more efficient and streamlined public administration that better serves the public interest.</p>
<p>2. Upholding Integrity and Accountability</p>
<p>Another important aspect of the tenure at pleasure principle is its role in promoting integrity and accountability within the public service. In cases where a public servant engages in corrupt practices, misconduct, or other actions that undermine public trust, the President or the Governor can use their tenure at pleasure power to remove the individual from their position. This sends a strong message that such behaviour will not be tolerated and reinforces the importance of integrity and accountability in public service.</p>
<p><em><strong>Conclusion</strong></em></p>
<p>The Supreme Court's judgment highlights the delicate balance that must be struck between the tenure at pleasure principle, public interest, and the fundamentals of constitutionalism. While the principle allows the executive to efficiently manage public servants and ensure effective governance, it must be exercised within the framework of the Constitution, respecting individual rights, the rule of law, and the separation of powers. By carefully navigating this balance, the tenure at pleasure principle can serve as an important tool for upholding the public interest and promoting good governance in India.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-29:/entries/70068Bail Jurisprudence in India2023-04-29T13:44:00+05:302023-05-04T02:01:27+05:30<p><img alt="" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697574/271;271;b5e14e0ac51abf111cfccba4030222cc8669e26d.png" style="border:none; float:left">Bail is a fundamental aspect of any criminal justice system that guarantees the accused the right to a fair trial. The practice of granting bail grew out of the need to safeguard the fundamental right to liberty. No person shall be deprived of their personal liberty unless prescribed so by a reasonable, fair and just procedure. </p>
<p>However, bail jurisprudence in India is in dire need of reform, as is evident from the recent judgments of the Supreme Court and the observations made by its judges. The main challenges faced by bail jurisprudence in India are:</p>
<p>- The lack of uniformity and consistency in granting or refusing bail<br>
- The arbitrary and excessive imposition of bail conditions and amounts<br>
- The misuse and abuse of anticipatory bail and cancellation of bail<br>
- The absence of a comprehensive bail legislation</p>
<p><strong> Lack of uniformity and consistency</strong></p>
<p>The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) categorises offences into bailable and non-bailable offences. Bailable offences are those for which the accused can claim release on bail as a matter of right. Non-bailable offences are those for which the accused cannot claim bail as a matter of right but can approach the court for discretion. </p>
<p>However, the CrPC does not provide any clear guidelines or criteria for exercising this discretion. The courts have to balance the individual rights of the accused and the collective interests of society, which are often subjective and vague. As a result, different courts may adopt different approaches and considerations while granting or refusing bail, leading to inconsistency and unpredictability.</p>
<p>For example, some courts may give more weight to the gravity of the offence or the possibility of tampering with evidence or witnesses. In comparison, others may give more weight to the personal circumstances of the accused or the duration of detention. Some courts may grant bail liberally, while others may deny it routinely. Some courts may grant bail on humanitarian grounds, while others may refuse it on public interest grounds.</p>
<p>This lack of uniformity and consistency creates confusion and uncertainty among the accused, the lawyers and the public. It also undermines the credibility and legitimacy of the judicial system.</p>
<p><strong>Arbitrary and excessive imposition of bail conditions and amounts</strong></p>
<p>Another challenge faced by bail jurisprudence in India is the arbitrary and excessive imposition of bail conditions and amounts by some courts. Bail conditions are meant to ensure that the accused does not abscond, interfere with the investigation or trial, or commit any further offence while on bail. Bail amounts are meant to secure the presence of the accused before the court. </p>
<p>However, some courts impose bail conditions and amounts that are unreasonable, irrelevant or disproportionate to the nature and circumstances of the case. For example, some courts may impose conditions that restrict the movement, speech or association of the accused beyond what is necessary or permissible under law. Some courts may impose amounts that are beyond the financial capacity ofthe accused or unrelated to their risk of flight or recidivism.</p>
<p>Such arbitrary and excessive imposition of bail conditions and amounts violates the principle of proportionality and infringes upon the fundamental rights of the accused. It also defeats the purpose of bail by making it inaccessible or unaffordable for many accused.</p>
<p><strong>Misuse and abuse of anticipatory bail and cancellation of bail</strong></p>
<p>A third challenge faced by bail jurisprudence in India is the misuse and abuse of anticipatory bail and cancellation of bail by some parties. Anticipatory bail is a special type of bail that can be granted by a court before arrest when there is a reasonable apprehension that a person may be arrested for a non-bailable offence. Cancellation of bail is a power vested in a court to revoke or recall a bail order when there are sufficient grounds to do so. </p>
<p>However, some parties misuse or abuse these powers for ulterior motives or malicious purposes. For example, some accused may seek anticipatory bail to avoid arrest or investigation altogether or to delay or derail the judicial process. Some complainants may seek cancellation of bail to harass or intimidate the accused, or to influence or manipulate the outcome of the case.</p>
<p>Such misuse or abuse of anticipatory bail and cancellation of bail undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the judicial system.</p>
<p><strong>Absence of a comprehensive bail legislation</strong></p>
<p>A fourth challenge faced by bail jurisprudence in India is the absence of comprehensive bail legislation that can address these issues and provide a clear and coherent framework for granting or refusing bail. The CrPC provides only some general guidelines and principles for bail but does not cover all aspects of the bail process. For example, the CrPC does not define what constitutes a bailable or non-bailable offence, nor does it specify the criteria for granting anticipatory bail or interim bail. Moreover, the CrPC does not lay down any uniform standards for imposing conditions on bail, such as sureties, bonds, reporting requirements, etc. These matters are left to the discretion of the courts or the police, which can lead to arbitrariness and inconsistency in bail decisions.</p>
<p>The lack of comprehensive bail legislation also creates confusion and uncertainty among the accused, the lawyers, and the public. The accused may not know their rights and obligations regarding bail and may face difficulties in securing bail due to procedural hurdles or financial constraints. The lawyers may not have adequate knowledge or resources to effectively represent their clients in bail matters. The public may not have a clear understanding of the rationale and purpose of bail and may perceive it as a privilege or a loophole for the accused to escape justice.</p>
<p>Therefore, there is an urgent need for comprehensive bail legislation that can codify and consolidate the existing laws and practices on bail, and provide a uniform and transparent framework for granting or refusing bail. Such legislation should also reflect the constitutional values of liberty, dignity, and presumption of innocence, and balance them with the interests of justice, public safety, and victim rights. Comprehensive bail legislation can also help in reducing overcrowding in prisons, ensuring speedy trials, and promoting the fair and humane treatment of the accused.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-29:/entries/70067Default Bail as a Right of Accused [Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India]2023-04-29T13:05:00+05:302023-05-04T02:00:42+05:30<p>The recent judgment by the Supreme Court of India in the case of <a class="navigation_external_link" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/12d6vUg6DRmf820EJVDuuU_FZpPK-0cX1/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"><em>Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India </em></a>has been a landmark decision in affirming the fundamental right of default bail under Article 21 of the Constitution. The case was filed by Ritu Chhabaria to seek the release of her husband, who was arrested by CBI in a corruption case and was not granted default bail despite the expiry of the statutory period of 60 days.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court's judgment is significant in upholding the principle of personal liberty and dignity of an accused person, who cannot be kept in custody indefinitely without a fair trial. The Court held that the right to default bail is not a matter of discretion but a matter of right, and it can be availed by an accused irrespective of the gravity or nature of the offence. The judgment is a welcome step in protecting the rights of an accused person and ensuring justice for all.</p>
<p>The case raised an important question of law regarding the interpretation of Section 167 (2) of the Cr.PC, which provides for default bail when the investigation is not completed within the prescribed period. The Supreme Court clarified that default bail is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and it cannot be defeated by filing incomplete or supplementary charge sheets after the expiry of the statutory period. The Court observed that Section 167 (2) of the Cr.PC is a "code unto itself" and it does not depend on any other provision for its operation.</p>
<p>The judgment is significant in the context of protecting the personal liberty and dignity of an accused person. It ensures that the authorities cannot keep an accused in custody indefinitely without a fair trial. This decision will have far-reaching consequences in the Indian legal system, as it will ensure that the rights of an accused person are protected, and the rule of law is respected.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court's decision is also a reminder to the investigating agencies to complete their investigation within the stipulated time and to respect the rule of law. The judgment will act as a deterrent to investigating agencies that may be inclined to misuse their powers to detain an accused person. The Court's decision also emphasizes the importance of timely and efficient investigation, which is critical to ensuring that justice is delivered to the victim as well as the accused.</p>
<p>The Court's decision is significant in light of the increasing number of cases where accused persons are detained for prolonged periods without a fair trial. This decision will give confidence to the common man that the Indian judiciary is committed to upholding their rights and ensuring justice for all. It is a welcome step towards ensuring that the rule of law prevails in the country and the legal system functions in a fair and efficient manner.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the judgment by the Supreme Court in the case of Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India is a landmark decision that affirms the fundamental right of default bail under Article 21 of the Constitution. This decision is significant in upholding the personal liberty and dignity of an accused person and ensuring that the authorities complete their investigation within the stipulated time and respect the rule of law. It is a welcome step in protecting the rights of an accused person and ensuring justice for all. The decision will act as a reminder to the investigating agencies to exercise their powers judiciously and efficiently and will give confidence to the common man that the Indian judiciary is committed to upholding their rights.</p>
<p> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-29:/entries/70066The Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Personal Privacy - A Synopsis and Analysis2023-04-29T01:55:00+05:302023-05-06T21:29:48+05:30<p><img alt="Right to Privacy" src="https://junejalegal.firm.in/files/resized/697693/409;227;d51b4345cfd96f02430a61167b4825f14222c8a8.jpg" style="border:none; float:right"><strong style="font-weight:700">Introduction:</strong></p>
<p>In the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors, the Supreme Court of India delivered a historic judgment, recognizing the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution. This groundbreaking decision has far-reaching implications for citizens, the government, and various policies in India. This blog post delves into the background of the case, the key aspects of the judgment, and provides an in-depth analysis of its potential impact on Indian citizens, government policies, and legal practices.</p>
<p><strong style="font-weight:700">Background:</strong></p>
<p>The Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case was initiated by a group of petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme, a biometric identification program launched by the Indian government. The petitioners argued that the scheme infringed upon their fundamental right to privacy by mandating the provision of sensitive personal information to the government. To address this issue, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether the right to privacy is protected under the Indian Constitution.</p>
<p><strong style="font-weight:700">The Judgment:</strong></p>
<p>In a unanimous decision, the nine-judge bench held that the right to privacy is protected under the Constitution of India. The court recognized that privacy is a multifaceted concept that includes various aspects, such as personal autonomy, informational self-determination, and the right to be left alone. The court extensively relied on international human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), as well as precedents from other jurisdictions to reinforce the importance of privacy as a fundamental right.</p>
<p><strong style="font-weight:700">Key Aspects of the Judgment:</strong></p>
<p>1. Privacy as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty: The court held that privacy is an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty, protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court also emphasized that privacy is not an absolute right and can be restricted based on certain reasonable grounds.</p>
<p>2. Privacy as an essential component of dignity: The judgment highlighted that privacy is essential for the preservation of personal dignity, as it enables individuals to protect their innermost thoughts, beliefs, and feelings from unwanted intrusion.</p>
<p>3. Privacy as a necessary condition for the enjoyment of other rights: The court observed that privacy is indispensable for the exercise and enjoyment of various other fundamental rights, such as the right to free speech, the right to form associations, and the right to practice any profession or occupation.</p>
<p>4. Limitations on the right to privacy: The court laid down a three-fold test to determine whether a restriction on privacy is permissible. The test requires that the restriction must be sanctioned by law, must have a legitimate aim, and must be proportional to the aim sought to be achieved.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong style="font-weight:700">Significance and Implications of the Judgment:</strong></p>
<p>1. Recognition of privacy as a fundamental right: The judgment marks a significant milestone in the protection of individual rights in India by recognizing privacy as a fundamental right. This recognition will profoundly impact how the government and its agencies handle citizens' personal information and their right to privacy.</p>
<p>2. Implications for government policies and programs: The judgment necessitates that the government ensures its policies and programs do not infringe upon the fundamental right to privacy. This may require the government to review and potentially amend several existing laws and policies dealing with personal information, such as data protection regulations and surveillance practices.</p>
<p>3. A framework for future privacy-related disputes: The judgment provides a comprehensive framework for adjudicating future privacy-related disputes. By establishing clear principles and guidelines, lower courts will now have a solid foundation to rely upon when dealing with cases involving privacy concerns.</p>
<p>4. Impact on the Aadhaar scheme: While the judgment does not directly strike down the Aadhaar scheme, it does necessitate a re-examination of the scheme's constitutionality and compliance with privacy norms. As a result, the government may need to introduce additional safeguards to protect personal data collected under the Aadhaar program and ensure that it is used only for legitimate purposes. The judgment also sets the stage for further litigation concerning the Aadhaar scheme and other policies that may potentially infringe upon the right to privacy.</p>
<p>5. Implications for the private sector: The judgment's recognition of privacy as a fundamental right is not limited to government actions but also extends to private entities that collect and process personal information. As a result, businesses and organizations operating in India will need to ensure their data collection and processing practices comply with the right to privacy and relevant data protection regulations.</p>
<p>6. Potential impact on emerging technologies: The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for emerging technologies that involve the collection and processing of personal data, such as artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and the Internet of Things. Policymakers and technology developers will need to carefully consider privacy concerns while developing new technologies and regulations to govern their use.</p>
<p><strong style="font-weight:700">Conclusion:</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court's landmark judgment in the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case is a major step forward in the protection of individual privacy in India. By recognizing privacy as a fundamental right, the court has set a strong precedent that will ensure the government, its agencies, and private entities are held accountable for their handling of citizens' personal information. This decision will not only impact the Aadhaar scheme but also serve as a guiding force for future legislation, policies, and technology development concerning privacy in India. As a result, it is essential for stakeholders to carefully consider the implications of this judgment and take necessary measures to uphold the right to privacy in their respective domains.</p>
<p> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-29:/entries/70065Right to Privacy vs. Aadhaar – A Balanced Approach2023-04-29T01:46:00+05:302023-05-06T21:41:44+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Introduction:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment that has far-reaching implications on the right to privacy and the Aadhaar project. The 1,448-page judgment, addresses the constitutionality of the Aadhaar Act and lays down guidelines for the protection of citizens' privacy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Background:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Aadhaar is a 12-digit unique identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to Indian residents. The Aadhaar project was launched in 2009 as a means to provide a unique identification number to every citizen, enabling them to access various government services and benefits. However, the implementation of Aadhaar raised several concerns, particularly in terms of privacy, surveillance, and exclusion of marginalized communities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Supreme Court's Decision:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The judgment, which is a result of multiple petitions challenging the Aadhaar Act, is a crucial step in balancing the right to privacy with the government's interest in ensuring transparency, efficiency, and effective delivery of public services.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Key Takeaways from the Judgment:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1. Right to Privacy - The Supreme Court, while recognizing the fundamental right to privacy, has held that the Aadhaar Act does not violate this right. The court noted that minimal biometric information is collected, and the data is adequately secured, ensuring that the right to privacy is not disproportionately infringed upon.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2. Aadhaar for Welfare Schemes - The court upheld the use of Aadhaar for availing government welfare schemes and subsidies. It emphasized that the project is instrumental in preventing corruption and ensuring that the benefits reach the intended beneficiaries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">3. Section 57 Struck Down - The court struck down Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act, which allowed private entities to demand Aadhaar for verification purposes. This means that private companies, such as telecom operators and banks, cannot mandate Aadhaar as the sole means of identification.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">4. No Exclusion - The court asserted that no one shall be denied benefits for the lack of an Aadhaar card. It directed the government to ensure that the marginalized sections of society are not excluded from accessing essential services due to the absence of an Aadhaar number.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">5. Data Storage and Security - The court reduced the data retention period from five years to six months and directed the government to establish a robust data protection regime. It also emphasized the need for stronger security measures to safeguard citizens' data.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The judgment represents a balanced approach in safeguarding the right to privacy while enabling the government to ensure efficient and transparent delivery of public services. It reiterates the importance of data protection and privacy in the digital age and calls for stronger mechanisms to secure citizens' information. This landmark decision serves as a precedent for future cases involving the delicate balance between individual privacy rights and the state's interest in providing efficient public services.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-04-14:/entries/70044Freedom of speech, its value in the constitution of India, and the views of Dr B R Ambedkar on this fundamental right2023-04-14T13:53:00+05:302023-04-14T13:59:18+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Freedom of speech is one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. It is a cornerstone of democracy and is essential for the development of a just and equitable society. The right to free speech enables individuals to express their opinions, thoughts, and ideas without fear of censorship or persecution. This essay will discuss the importance of freedom of speech, its value in the constitution of India, and the views of Dr B R Ambedkar on this fundamental right.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Freedom of speech is crucial for the functioning of a democratic society. It provides individuals with the ability to express their opinions and ideas freely, participate in public debates, and to hold their elected representatives accountable. Free speech allows citizens to express dissent and criticism of the government, and it plays a critical role in the development of a healthy and vibrant democracy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The right to free speech also has value beyond its role in promoting democracy. It is a fundamental human right that enables individuals to express their creativity, to communicate with others, and to seek and impart knowledge. Free speech allows for the exchange of ideas, which is essential for the growth and development of society.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In India, the right to free speech is enshrined in Article 19 of the Constitution. This article guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression to all citizens of the country. The Constitution recognizes the importance of free speech in a democratic society and ensures that individuals are free to express their opinions and ideas without fear of retribution.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, the right to free speech is not absolute. The Constitution also recognizes the need for reasonable restrictions on this right. These restrictions include issues such as public order, morality, and national security. The Indian government has the power to impose restrictions on free speech if it is deemed necessary to protect these values.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite the constitutional guarantees of free speech, there have been instances where the government has curtailed this right. The Indian government has used laws such as sedition, defamation, and hate speech to restrict the expression of dissenting opinions. This has led to concerns about the state of free speech in India and the need to protect this fundamental right.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Dr B R Ambedkar, the architect of the Indian Constitution, was a strong advocate of free speech. He recognized the importance of this right in promoting democracy, fostering critical inquiry, and encouraging innovation. Dr Ambedkar believed that the right to express one's opinion and thoughts freely without fear of retribution or censorship was essential for the growth and development of society.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Dr. Ambedkar believed that free speech was necessary to challenge the injustices and inequalities that existed in society. He saw the free speech as a tool for marginalized communities to speak out against discrimination and demand equal rights and opportunities. He believed that the voices of the oppressed and marginalized should be heard and that they should be given a platform to express themselves freely.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, Dr. Ambedkar recognized that freedom of speech also came with responsibilities. He believed that individuals should be held accountable for their words and actions, and that speech should not be used to incite violence, hatred, or bigotry. He argued that the right to free speech should not be used as a shield to protect hate speech or promote intolerance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Dr. Ambedkar believed that free speech should be protected, even if it was unpopular or controversial. He argued that unpopular opinions were necessary for the growth and development of society, and that these opinions should be given a platform to be heard. Dr. Ambedkar recognized that free speech was necessary for promoting rational thinking and critical inquiry, and that it played a crucial role in shaping the development of society.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In conclusion, Dr. B R Ambedkar's views on freedom of speech were rooted in his belief in democracy, equality, and social justice. He recognized that the right to express oneself freely was essential for the growth and development of society, but also understood that it came with responsibilities. He saw the free speech as a tool for challenging injustice and promoting equality, but recognized that it had to be balanced against other values. Dr. Ambedkar's ideas on freedom of speech continue to be relevant today and serve as a guide for societies around the world.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-29:/entries/70016Need for a separate 'Legislation' on 'Bail' in India.2023-03-29T20:12:00+05:302023-05-04T02:02:53+05:30<p>The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a landmark judgment on the issue of bail law in the country. The judgment, authored by Justice U.U. Lalit, addressed the various aspects of bail, such as the principles governing the grant or refusal of bail, the conditions that can be imposed on bail, the role of public prosecutors and courts in bail matters, and the need for comprehensive legislation on bail.</p>
<p>The judgment was delivered in a criminal appeal filed by one Arnab Goswami, a journalist, and editor-in-chief of Republic TV, who was arrested by the Maharashtra police in connection with an abetment to suicide case. Goswami had approached the Supreme Court after the Bombay High Court rejected his plea for interim bail.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court granted bail to Goswami and two other co-accused in the case, observing that the allegations against them did not prima facie establish any offence of abetment to suicide. The court also noted that the arrest of Goswami was an attempt to silence his voice and interfere with his right to freedom of speech and expression.</p>
<p>The court then proceeded to lay down some broad guidelines on the issue of bail, which are as follows:</p>
<p>- Bail is the rule and jail is the exception. The courts should exercise their discretion in granting or refusing bail with utmost care and caution, keeping in mind the gravity of the offense, the nature of evidence, the antecedents of the accused, and the impact of the crime on society.<br>
- The courts should not impose excessive or unreasonable conditions on bail, which may amount to a denial of bail. The conditions should be relevant to the purpose of bail, which is to ensure the presence of the accused during the trial and prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.<br>
- Public prosecutors should act fairly and impartially in bail matters. They should not oppose bail merely for the sake of opposition but should assist the courts in arriving at a just decision based on facts and law.<br>
- The courts should not adopt a mechanical approach in granting or refusing bail. They should consider each case on its own merits and circumstances, and apply their judicial mind independently.<br>
- There is an urgent need for comprehensive legislation on bail, which can codify the principles and procedures relating to bail, and provide clear and uniform guidelines for the courts and other stakeholders.</p>
<p>Another milestone judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein the guidelines on bail came to be issued by a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundaresh in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs CBI. The judgment, delivered on October 7, 2021, is a landmark one that reiterates the principle of "bail, not jail" and lays down certain conditions for granting bail to accused who are not arrested during the investigation on the filing of the charge sheet.</p>
<p>The background of the case is that the petitioner, Satender Kumar Antil, was an accused in a corruption case registered by the CBI in 2018. He was not arrested during the investigation and was granted anticipatory bail by the trial court. However, after the charge sheet was filed in 2020, the CBI moved an application for cancellation of his anticipatory bail and sought his arrest. The trial court allowed the application and cancelled his bail. The petitioner challenged this order before the Delhi High Court, which dismissed his plea and upheld the trial court's order. Aggrieved by this, he approached the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court, after hearing both sides, quashed the orders of the trial court and the high court and restored the anticipatory bail of the petitioner. The court observed that there was no change in circumstances or new material to justify the cancellation of his bail. The court also noted that there was no allegation of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses against him. The court held that once an accused is granted anticipatory bail, he cannot be arrested on the filing of a charge sheet unless there are cogent reasons to do so.</p>
<p>The court also issued some guidelines on the aspect of the grant of bail to accused who are not arrested during the investigation on the filing of the charge sheet. The court accepted the suggestions made by Additional Solicitor General SV Raja and Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra in this regard. The guidelines are as follows:</p>
<p>- The accused should be given notice by the investigating agency before filing of charge sheet and should be asked to surrender before the court within a reasonable time.</p>
<p>- The accused should cooperate with the investigation and should not abscond or evade the process of law.</p>
<p>- The accused should not commit any offence or indulge in any unlawful activity while on bail.</p>
<p>- The accused should furnish adequate security and abide by the conditions imposed by the court while granting bail.- The court should consider the nature and gravity of the offence, the role of the accused, the possibility of his fleeing from justice, and other relevant factors while deciding on bail.</p>
<p>- The court should not mechanically grant or deny bail to such accused and should exercise its discretion judiciously and cautiously.</p>
<p>The Hon'ble Supreme further Court gave the following guidelines to the government:</p>
<p>- The Government of India may consider the introduction of a separate enactment in the nature of a Bail Act so as to streamline the grant of bails. </p>
<p>- The investigating agencies and their officers are duty-bound to comply with the mandate of Sections 41 and 41A of the Code and the directions issued by this Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra). Any dereliction on their part has to be brought to the notice of the higher authorities by the court followed by appropriate action. </p>
<p>-The courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Sections 41 and 41A of the Code. Any non-compliance would entitle the accused for grant of bail. </p>
<p>-There need not be any insistence of a bail application while considering the application under Section 88, 170, 204 and 209 of the Code.</p>
<p>-There needs to be strict compliance of the mandate laid down in the judgment of this court in Siddharth Vs State of UP.</p>
<p>-The State and Central Governments will have to comply with the directions issued by this Court from time to time with respect to constitution of special courts. The High Court in consultation with the State Governments will have to undertake an exercise on the need for special courts. The vacancies in the position of Presiding Officers of the special courts will have to be filled up expeditiously. </p>
<p>-The High Courts are directed to undertake the exercise of finding out the undertrial prisoners who are not able to comply with the bail conditions. After doing so, appropriate action will have to be taken in light of Section 440 of the Code, facilitating the release. </p>
<p>-An exercise will have to be done in a similar manner to comply with the mandate of Section 436A of the Code both at the district judiciary level and the High Court as earlier directed by this Court in Bhim Singh (supra), followed by appropriate orders. </p>
<p>-Bail applications ought to be disposed of within a period of two weeks except if the provisions mandate otherwise, with the exception being an intervening application. Applications for anticipatory bail are expected to be disposed of within a period of six weeks with the exception of any intervening application. </p>
<p>The court also emphasized that these guidelines are not exhaustive and are only illustrative. The court said that each case has to be decided on its own merits and circumstances. The court also clarified that these guidelines apply only to those cases where the accused are not arrested during the investigation on the filing of the charge sheet and not to those cases where they are arrested at any stage.</p>
<p>The judgment is a welcome step towards ensuring that bail is granted as a matter of right and not as a matter of grace. It also reaffirms that liberty is a fundamental right that cannot be curtailed lightly or arbitrarily. It also balances the interests of justice and fair trial with the rights of the accused. It is hoped that these guidelines will be followed by all courts and investigating agencies in letter and spirit.</p>
<p> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-29:/entries/70015Bail - Important Supreme Court Judments2023-03-29T20:06:00+05:302023-03-29T20:12:30+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Bail is a legal term that refers to the release of a person who has been arrested or detained for an alleged crime, on the condition that he or she will appear before the court when required. Bail is a way of ensuring that the accused does not abscond from justice, and also respects the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Bail can be granted by the police or by the court, depending on the nature and severity of the offence. The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, classifies offences into two categories: bailable and non-bailable. Bailable offences are those for which bail can be claimed as a matter of right by the accused, whereas non-bailable offences are those for which bail is granted at the discretion of the court, after considering various factors such as the gravity of the offence, the character, and antecedents of the accused, the possibility of tampering with evidence or witnesses, etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The CrPC also provides for different types of bail, such as regular bail, interim bail, and anticipatory bail. Regular bail is granted to a person who is already in custody after he or she applies to the court for release. Interim bail is granted for a short period of time, pending the final disposal of the bail application or the trial. Anticipatory bail is granted to a person who apprehends arrest for a non-bailable offence, before he or she is arrested.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The law of bail in India has evolved through various judicial pronouncements over the years. Some of the landmark judgments on bail are:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em>Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Administration), </em>AIR 1978 SC 179: In this case, the Supreme Court laid down certain guidelines for granting or refusing bail in non-bailable offences. The Court held that while granting bail, the court should consider whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life; whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that he has been falsely implicated; whether he is likely to abscond or misuse his liberty; whether he has a criminal record or bad reputation; whether his release would create law and order problems; etc. The Court also held that while refusing bail, the court should record its reasons in writing.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em>Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab</em>, AIR 1980 SC 1632: In this case, the Supreme Court clarified the scope and ambit of Section 438 of CrPC, which deals with anticipatory bail. The Court held that anticipatory bail is not a blanket order of immunity from arrest, but only a direction to release the accused on bail in case of arrest. The Court also held that anticipatory bail can be granted for any offence, except those punishable with death or imprisonment for life; that it can be granted at any stage before arrest; that it can be granted by any High Court or Sessions Court having jurisdiction; that it can be granted for a limited duration or till the end of trial; that it can be subject to conditions imposed by the court; etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em>State v. Capt. Jagjit Singh</em>, AIR 1962 SC 253: In this case, the Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail can be canceled by the court if it is satisfied that it was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; that there is a change in circumstances; that there is interference with investigation or administration of justice; that there is an abuse of liberty; etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em>Anil Kumar v. M.K. Aiyappa, </em>(2013) 10 SCC 705: In this case, the Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail can be extended beyond 60 days if no chargesheet is filed within that period; that anticipatory bail cannot be canceled merely because chargesheet has been filed; that anticipatory bail cannot be canceled without giving notice and opportunity of hearing to the accused; etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em>Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. State of Maharashtra & Ors</em>., (2021) SCC Online SC 7: In this case, the Supreme Court reiterated the importance of personal liberty and freedom of speech and expression in a democracy, and held that courts should exercise their jurisdiction to uphold these rights while dealing with bail applications. The Court also held that courts should not be influenced by public opinion or media trial while deciding on bail; that courts should apply their mind independently and objectively while granting or refusing bail; that courts should not impose excessive or unreasonable conditions while granting bail; etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These are some of the notable judgments on bail in India that have shaped and refined the law on this subject. Bail is a crucial aspect of the criminal justice system.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-28:/entries/70013Freedom of Speech, Defamation and Chilling Effect2023-03-28T22:30:00+05:302023-03-28T22:45:36+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Freedom of speech and expression is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article 19(1)(a). It is widely regarded as an essential feature of a democratic society, as it enables citizens to express their opinions, dissent, criticism, and grievances against the government and public officials. However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offense.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The role of courts in India is to protect and uphold the freedom of speech and expression, and to strike down any law or action that violates or abridges this right. The courts have also interpreted the scope and content of this right in various cases, and have laid down certain principles and guidelines to balance it with other competing interests.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">One of the landmark judgments of the Supreme Court of India on the subject of freedom of speech and expression is <em>Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras </em>(1950), where the Court held that a law that imposed a ban on the entry and circulation of a journal in a state was unconstitutional, as it violated Article 19(1)(a). The Court observed that "freedom of speech and expression includes freedom of propagation of ideas which is ensured by the freedom of circulation". The Court also held that the expression "public order" in Article 19(2) was a narrower concept than "law and order", and that only those restrictions that were necessary to prevent public disorder could be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Another important judgment of the Supreme Court on this subject is <em>Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India </em>(1972), where the Court struck down a government policy that restricted the import of newsprint and allocated it among newspapers in a discriminatory manner. The Court held that this policy violated Article 19(1)(a), as it affected the freedom of the press, which was an integral part of freedom of speech and expression. The Court observed that "the press has a very significant role to play in a democratic society. It has to inform, educate and enlighten people on various issues affecting them. It has to expose corruption, maladministration, and misuse of power. It has to provide a platform for diverse views and opinions. It has to foster public debate and discussion on matters of public interest. It has to act as a watchdog over the government and other public authorities".</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A recent judgment of the Supreme Court on this subject is <em>Ram v. Union of India </em>(2020), where the Court quashed a batch of criminal defamation cases filed against journalists and media houses for defaming the then Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa in respect of her conduct in the discharge of her public functions. The Court explained that public officials were subjected to a higher threshold of criticism by virtue of being in public office and that in all cases, there was no defamation against the state per se. The Court also observed that "the right to free speech cannot be curtailed further" by invoking criminal defamation laws, which were anachronistic and had a chilling effect on free expression.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Another Judgment in <em>Sakal Papers v. Union of India </em>(1962): This case challenged a law that regulated the number and price of pages in newspapers. The Court held that this law violated freedom of speech and expression as it affected the circulation and content of newspapers. The Court also held that freedom of press is an integral part of freedom of speech and expression.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In case of <em>Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India </em>(1978): This case challenged a law that empowered the government to impound the passport of any person without giving any reason. The Court held that this law violated freedom of speech and expression as it restricted the right to travel abroad and exchange views with others. The Court also held that freedom of speech and expression is not confined to Article 19 (1) (a) but also flows from Article 21 which guarantees right to life and personal liberty.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In <em>S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram </em>(1989): This case challenged a ban on a film that depicted inter-caste marriage and communal violence. The Court held that this ban violated freedom of speech and expression as it curtailed the right to receive and impart information and ideas. The Court also held that public order cannot be a ground for imposing prior restraint on expression unless there is a clear and present danger.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Shreya Singhal v. Union of India </em>(2015): This case challenged a provision in the Information Technology Act that criminalized sending offensive messages online. The Court held that this provision violated freedom of speech and expression as it was vague, overbroad, and had a <strong><em>chilling effect </em></strong>on online communication. The Court also held that freedom of speech and expression includes freedom to access information on the internet.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>The Chilling Effect Doctrine and the Supreme Court of India</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The chilling effect doctrine is a legal concept that refers to the situation where a law or a policy discourages or restrains the legitimate exercise of a constitutional right, such as the freedom of speech or expression. The doctrine originated in the United States, where it has been used to challenge laws that impose prior restraints, censorship, or criminal sanctions on speech.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In India, the chilling effect doctrine has been invoked in several cases involving the freedom of speech and expression, especially in relation to criminal defamation, sedition, and contempt of court. The Supreme Court of India has recognized that these laws can have a chilling effect on free speech and has tried to balance them with the right to reputation and public order.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, the Supreme Court has also been criticized for not adequately applying the chilling effect doctrine and for upholding laws that stifle dissent and criticism. For instance, in 2016, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of criminal defamation under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, despite acknowledging that it can have a chilling effect on free speech. The court justified this by saying that the right to reputation is also a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and that criminal defamation is a reasonable restriction on free speech under Article 19 (2).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Similarly, in 2020, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, which penalizes any speech or acts that brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government. The court said that sedition is necessary to protect national security and sovereignty and that it does not have a chilling effect on free speech as long as it is applied only to cases involving incitement to violence or public disorder.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Supreme Court has also been reluctant to apply the chilling effect doctrine to cases involving contempt of court, which empowers the court to punish any speech or act that scandalizes or lowers the authority of the court or interferes with its administration of justice. The court has maintained that contempt of court is essential to uphold the dignity and majesty of the judiciary and to ensure public confidence in its functioning. The court has also said that contempt of court does not violate free speech as long as it is exercised with caution and restraint.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The chilling effect doctrine is an important tool to safeguard the freedom of speech and expression in a democracy. However, its application in India has been inconsistent and inadequate. The Supreme Court of India needs to revisit its approach to the chilling effect doctrine and strike a better balance between free speech and other competing interests.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>Defamation vs Freedom of Speech</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aspect of defamation vs freedom of speech is a contentious one, as it involves a clash between two competing rights: the right to reputation and dignity, and the right to free expression. The Indian law recognizes both civil and criminal remedies for defamation, but there has been a growing demand for decriminalizing defamation, as it is seen as a tool for harassment and intimidation by powerful individuals and entities against journalists, activists, whistleblowers, and critics. The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of criminal defamation laws in <em>Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India </em>(2016), but has also cautioned that they should be applied with care and caution, and only when there is a clear intention to harm or knowledge or reason to believe that such harm will be caused by the impugned statement.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The courts have also recognized certain defenses for defamation, such as truth, fair comment, privilege, consent, and apology. The defense of truth is available when the statement is made for the public good or relates to public conduct or public question. The defense of fair comment is available when the statement is an expression of opinion based on facts that are true or privileged. The defense of privilege is available when the statement is made on certain occasions or platforms where there is an overriding public interest or duty to communicate such information.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Defamation is a civil or criminal wrong that involves harming the reputation or dignity of another person by making false or malicious statements about him or her. Defamation can be a ground for restricting freedom of speech under Article 19 (2) as it affects the rights or interests of others.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, defamation cannot be used as a tool to stifle legitimate criticism or dissent. The Supreme Court has laid down certain principles to balance defamation and freedom<br>
of speech, such as:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- The statement must be false and defamatory;<br>
- The statement must be made with malice or reckless disregard for the truth;<br>
- The statement must cause actual harm or injury to reputation;<br>
- The statement must not fall within any exception or defense such as truth, fair comment, public interest, etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Supreme Court has also recognized that <em>public figures have a lower threshold for defamation </em>as they have voluntarily exposed themselves to public scrutiny and criticism.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>In conclusion</strong></em>, freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India, but it is not absolute and can be restricted on certain grounds such as defamation. Defamation is the act of harming the reputation of another person by making false statements in public. Defamation can be civil or criminal, depending on whether the remedy sought is monetary compensation or imprisonment. Criminal defamation has been upheld by the Supreme Court as a reasonable restriction on free speech, but it has also been criticized for having a chilling effect on free speech and dissent. A chilling effect is a negative deterrence that prevents people from exercising their right to free speech and expression for fear of legal consequences. Therefore, there is a need to balance the right to free speech and expression with the right to reputation and to ensure that criminal defamation laws are not misused to suppress criticism, opposition, or public interest.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-28:/entries/70012Recovery of dues by MSME Enterprises under MSME Development Act2023-03-28T22:14:00+05:302023-03-28T22:20:50+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are vital for the economic growth and development of India. They contribute significantly to the GDP, employment, exports and innovation of the country. However, one of the major challenges faced by MSMEs is the delay or non-payment of their dues by their buyers, which affects their cash flow, working capital and profitability.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To address this issue, the MSME Development Act, 2006 (the Act) provides a legal framework for the protection and promotion of MSMEs, and also lays down certain provisions for the recovery of dues by MSMEs from their buyers. In this blog post, we will discuss the salient features of these provisions and how they can help MSMEs recover their dues effectively and efficiently.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Who can claim benefits under the Act?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act applies to two categories of enterprises: manufacturing enterprises and service enterprises. Manufacturing enterprises are those that are engaged in the manufacturing or production of goods in any industry, while service enterprises are those that provide or render services. The Act further classifies these enterprises into micro, small and medium based on their investment in plant and machinery (for manufacturing enterprises) or equipment (for service enterprises).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, it is important to note that only micro and small enterprises (MSEs) can claim benefits under the Act for recovery of dues, as medium enterprises are excluded from this scope. Moreover, only those MSEs that have filed a memorandum (also known as Udyog Aadhaar) with the concerned authority are eligible to claim benefits under the Act.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>What are the benefits available under the Act?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act provides the following benefits to MSEs for recovery of dues:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- <em><strong>Time limit for payment</strong></em>: The Act stipulates that a buyer has to make payment to an MSE within a specified time limit, depending on whether there is an agreement between them or not. If there is no agreement, the payment must be made within 15 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services by the buyer. If there is an agreement, the payment must be made on or before the agreed date, provided that such date does not exceed 45 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services by the buyer.<br>
- <em><strong>Interest liability</strong></em>: The Act provides that if a buyer fails to make payment to an MSE within the specified time limit, then he has to pay interest to the MSE at a rate that is three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The interest is compounded monthly and accrues from the date of default till the date of actual payment.<br>
- <em><strong>Recovery mechanism</strong></em>: The Act provides a simple and speedy mechanism for recovery of dues by MSEs through conciliation and arbitration. The MSE can file an application with the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), a statutory body established by each state government under the Act. The MSEFC has to either conduct conciliation proceedings between the parties or refer them to any institution or center providing alternative dispute resolution services for conciliation. If conciliation fails or is not opted for by either party, then the MSEFC has to refer the dispute to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award passed by the arbitrator is final and binding on both parties and can be enforced as a decree of a civil court.<br>
- <em><strong>Other benefits</strong></em>: The Act also provides some other benefits to MSEs for recovery of dues, such as:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> - The buyer cannot deduct any amount from the payment due to an MSE without the prior written consent of the MSE.<br>
- The amount due to an MSE along with interest is recoverable as arrears of land revenue by any officer authorized by MSEFC.<br>
- The amount of interest paid or payable by a buyer to an MSE under the Act is not allowed as a deduction for computation of income tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-28:/entries/70011Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Its success and failures in the Indian Context with regard to commercial arbitrations.2023-03-28T19:37:00+05:302023-03-28T19:40:20+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;">Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that allows parties to settle their disputes without going to court. Arbitration is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the Act) in India, which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985. The Act aims to provide a speedy, efficient, and cost-effective mechanism for resolving commercial disputes through arbitration.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act has been amended twice, in 2015 and 2019, to address some of the issues and challenges faced by the arbitration regime in India. Some of the key amendments include:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- The establishment of the Arbitration Council of India (ACI), a statutory body to grade arbitral institutions, accredit arbitrators and promote arbitration in India.<br>
- The introduction of a time limit of 12 months for completing domestic arbitrations and 18 months for international arbitrations, extendable by mutual consent of the parties or by the court for sufficient cause.<br>
- The clarification of the scope and applicability of interim measures and emergency arbitrations under the Act.<br>
- The recognition of institutional arbitration and the empowerment of arbitral institutions to appoint arbitrators in case of default by the parties or their chosen mechanism.<br>
- The enhancement of the autonomy and impartiality of arbitrators by prescribing qualifications, experience, and norms of ethics for them.<br>
- The narrowing down of the grounds for setting aside arbitral awards and the exclusion of patent illegality as a ground for challenging international commercial arbitral awards.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The amendments have been widely welcomed by the arbitration community as they seek to align Indian arbitration law with international best practices and standards. However, some challenges and criticisms remain, such as:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- The lack of clarity and consistency in some of the provisions of the Act, such as the definition of "international commercial arbitration", the applicability of Part I (domestic arbitration) to foreign-seated arbitrations, and the scope of judicial intervention in arbitration matters.<br>
- The delay and backlog in the enforcement of arbitral awards due to multiple levels of appeals and challenges before various courts.<br>
- The high cost and complexity of arbitration proceedings due to factors such as multiple arbitrators, frequent adjournments, extensive document production, expert witnesses and legal fees.<br>
- The low awareness and preference for arbitration among Indian businesses and consumers due to cultural factors, lack of trust in arbitrators and arbitral institutions, and preference for judicial remedies.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Therefore, while the Act has made significant strides in improving the arbitration landscape in India, there is still room for further improvement and reform. Some possible suggestions include:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- Simplifying and harmonizing the provisions of the Act with international standards and conventions, such as the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958.<br>
- Streamlining and expediting the judicial process for enforcing arbitral awards by creating specialized arbitration benches or tribunals at various levels of courts.<br>
- Reducing the cost and duration of arbitration proceedings by encouraging online or hybrid modes of arbitration, limiting document production and discovery, adopting fast-track procedures, and imposing cost sanctions for frivolous claims or challenges.<br>
- Promoting arbitration awareness and education among various stakeholders, such as lawyers, judges, businesses, consumers, academicians, and students, through seminars, workshops, publications, and campaigns.<br>
- Developing a robust arbitration culture and ecosystem in India by fostering cooperation and collaboration among various actors, such as arbitral institutions, arbitrators, lawyers, courts, government agencies, and civil society organizations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Arbitration is a viable and valuable option for resolving commercial disputes in India. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 has laid down a solid foundation for developing a progressive and effective arbitration regime in India. However, it requires constant review and revision to keep pace with the changing needs and expectations of the parties. It also requires active participation and support from all stakeholders to ensure its success and sustainability.</p>
tag:junejalegal.firm.in,2023-03-28:/entries/70010Enforcement of Contract in India and Commercial Courts Act 2015.2023-03-28T19:22:00+05:302023-03-28T19:30:20+05:30<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Enforcement of Contract in India</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Contracts are essential for any business activity, as they define the rights and obligations of the parties involved in a transaction. However, contracts are only as good as their enforceability, which depends on the legal system and the dispute resolution mechanism available in a country. In this blog post, we will discuss the current state of contract enforcement in India, the challenges faced by businesses and investors, and the possible ways to improve it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The legal framework for contract enforcement in India consists of two main statutes: The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (ICA) and The Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA). The ICA lays down the general principles of contract law, such as offer and acceptance, consideration, capacity, consent, performance, breach, and remedies. The SRA provides for specific performance of contracts, injunctions, and declaratory decrees as alternative remedies to damages. Apart from these statutes, there are other laws that govern specific types of contracts, such as the sale of goods, partnership, arbitration, consumer protection, etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The main mode of contract enforcement in India is through litigation in civil courts. However, this process is often plagued by delays, costs, and uncertainties. According to the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business Report 2020, India ranks 163rd out of 190 countries in enforcing contracts. The report estimates that it takes an average of 1,445 days (almost four years) to resolve a commercial dispute in India, compared to 590 days in South Asia and 120 days in OECD high-income countries. The cost of enforcing a contract in India is also high at 31% of the claim value, compared to 16.8% in South Asia and 21.5% in OECD high-income countries. Moreover, the quality of judicial processes in India is low at 9.1 out of 18 points, compared to 11.9 in South Asia and 14.4 in OECD high-income countries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The reasons for this poor performance are manifold. Some of them are:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- Lack of adequate infrastructure and manpower in courts: There are about 19 judges per million people in India, compared to 111 in OECD high-income countries. There are also shortages of courtrooms, staff, equipment, and facilities.<br>
- Complex and outdated procedural laws: The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and The Evidence Act, 1872 govern the procedure and evidence in civil cases. However, these laws are often cumbersome and rigid, leading to unnecessary formalities and technicalities.<br>
- Frequent adjournments and appeals: The CPC allows parties to seek adjournments for various reasons, such as the absence of witnesses or lawyers, lack of documents or evidence, etc. This leads to prolonged trials and a backlog of cases. The CPC also allows parties to file multiple appeals at different levels of courts, which adds to the delay and cost.<br>
- Ineffective alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms: ADR mechanisms such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation, etc., are supposed to provide faster and cheaper ways of resolving disputes outside courts. However, these mechanisms are not widely used or trusted by parties due to various factors such as lack of awareness, expertise, enforceability, etc.<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
Given these challenges, there was an urgent need to improve contract enforcement in India to boost business confidence and investment climate. Necessary Steps included:<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
- Strengthening the infrastructure and capacity of courts: There is a need to increase the number of judges and court staff, provide adequate training and resources to them, upgrade the courtrooms and facilities with modern technology and equipment.<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
- Simplifying and reforming the procedural laws: There is a need to amend the CPC and other relevant laws to make them more user-friendly and flexible. Some of the reforms could include reducing or limiting adjournments and appeals; introducing case management systems; allowing electronic filing and service of documents; encouraging pre-trial conferences and settlement; streamlining evidence rules; etc.<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
- Promoting and facilitating ADR mechanisms: There is a need to create awareness and trust among parties about the benefits and advantages of ADR mechanisms; provide incentives and support for using them; ensure their quality and credibility; enforce their outcomes; etc.<br style='box-shadow: none; color: rgb(113, 113, 113); font-family: "Segoe UI", -apple-system, Segoe, Tahoma, HelveticaNeue, Roboto, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);'>
- Enacting a dedicated law for commercial courts: There is a need to enact a separate law for establishing specialized commercial courts at different levels with exclusive jurisdiction over commercial disputes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Commercial Courts Act 2015 - What Changed?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>The Commercial Courts Act, 2015: An Overview and Analysis</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (the Act) is a landmark legislation that aims to provide a speedy and efficient resolution of commercial disputes in India. The Act was enacted with the objective of improving the ease of doing business in India and attracting more foreign investment by creating a conducive legal environment for commercial transactions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act establishes a hierarchy of courts and tribunals to deal with commercial disputes of specified value, which is not less than one crore rupees or such higher amount as notified by the central government. The Act also introduces several amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the CPC) to streamline the procedure and timelines for commercial litigation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act provides for the constitution of the following forums for adjudicating commercial disputes:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- Commercial Courts: These are courts at the district level, except in those districts where the high court exercises ordinary original civil jurisdiction, i.e., Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras. The state governments are empowered to constitute commercial courts after consultation with the concerned high court.<br>
- Commercial Appellate Courts: These are courts at the district level, which have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the orders and decrees of commercial courts. The state governments are empowered to designate such appellate courts after consultation with the concerned high court.<br>
- Commercial Division: This is a division in the high court having ordinary original civil jurisdiction, which will exercise jurisdiction over all commercial disputes of specified value arising within its territorial limits. The chief justice of the high court will nominate judges to constitute the commercial division.<br>
- Commercial Appellate Division: This is a division in all high courts, which will hear appeals from the orders and decrees of commercial division and commercial courts. The chief justice of the high court will nominate judges to constitute the commercial appellate division.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act also provides for mandatory pre-institution mediation and settlement of commercial disputes, unless urgent interim relief is sought by any party. The mediation process will be conducted by authorities under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and will be completed within three months from the date of application. If the mediation is successful, the settlement agreement will have the same effect as an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act also introduces significant changes to the CPC in its application to commercial disputes, such as:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">- Limiting the scope of amendments to plaints and written statements;<br>
- Imposing strict timelines for filing written statements, completion of discovery and inspection, framing of issues, etc.;<br>
- Allowing summary judgment for claims that do not require oral evidence;<br>
- Providing for case management hearings and imposing costs for adjournments;<br>
- Empowering courts to order payment of deposits for grant of injunctions or stay of orders;<br>
- Enhancing the pecuniary jurisdiction of high courts for appeals from decrees of commercial courts or commercial divisions;<br>
- Providing for expeditious disposal of appeals by commercial appellate courts and commercial appellate divisions within six months from the date of filing.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act is expected to bring about a paradigm shift in the resolution of commercial disputes in India by ensuring timely and effective enforcement of contracts and rights. The Act also seeks to align India's legal framework with international best practices and standards for commercial litigation. The Act is a welcome step towards improving India's ranking in the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business Index, which measures various aspects of business regulation, including enforcing contracts.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, the success of the Act will depend largely on its implementation by the state governments, which are responsible for constituting and designating commercial courts and appellate courts. The Act also requires adequate infrastructure, manpower, and training for the smooth functioning of these forums. Moreover, the Act will have to withstand judicial scrutiny on various constitutional and legal issues that may arise in its application.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is a progressive legislation that has the potential to transform India's commercial dispute resolution system. However, it will require concerted efforts from all stakeholders, including the judiciary, executive, legislature, bar, and business community, to ensure its effective implementation and realization of its objectives.</p>